Comparison & Contrast Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Comparison & Contrast - Essay Exampleertain issues, he is mostly public lecture in general terms, on the other hand Harper lays out a clear externalize as to what his party intends to do when it comes into power. It is important for policy-making parties to explain just what they intend to do formerly they come into power and how they will go about achieving it, as well as mention what they fool done in the past, this instils confidence in the voters that they are ready to run the country, as well as shows the commitment of the political party to the voters. The fact that a political party is not only pull to gaining power, only if is sincere about working for the people should be made apparent to the voters as pecks as possible. When the leader of a political party simply talks in general and unnoticeable terms, the voters may feel disappointed because they do not find any solution to the problems that they face and they do not feel that their issues are being taken serious ly. On the other hand, when it is shown to them just how serious the political party is, by illustrating not only past performance, but also insistence on mentioning the party platform again and again, it shows the voters that the said political party and its leader are seriously considering the solutions to the problems the citizens face, be they economical or social. When it comes to explaining the steps that would be taken by the political party when it gets elected, it is easy to incorporate the pith in campaign speeches. Interestingly enough, both leaders also agree that there is a select to bring Canadians closer and to build bridges between people. However, again, Layton is vague about how his party would accomplish it, sluice though he states his party is ready for this change, Harper is clear that it is risque taxes, high spending, high unemployment, and high mortgages that creates resentment and divisiveness in the public. Interestingly, here Harper does not rely on a ny severalize to back his claims up. But on the other hand, he does lay out, and in quite a lot of detail too, how his party would achieve a to a greater extent cohesive Canada by keeping the taxes low and by creating more jobs. It is noteworthy that when a political party has not only planned a policy, but has also been running it with success, the voters have more confidence in it. Harper lays out the means done which the jobs will be created. The latter mentions the Economic transaction Plan that his previous government has implemented and which resulted in job creation before and, thus, proven its worth. It is ingenious of Harper to use the success of his Economic Action Plan as a bid for reelection, because the people have seen the fruits the plan has borne, and, thereby, would be more agreeable to his stance than that of others who have not laid out any concrete plans. It is also a good strategy to mention all the pamphlets and other written material available that will k eep the voters more informed as well. Harper, in